Oxfam GB gets back on track. Plus, a scoop on new funding for tropical forests. A storied INGO tries to turn the page on a series of scandals.

Also in today’s edition: Who’s helping Nepal in the wake of deadly flash flooding, and East Africa braces for its own possible coming deluge.
+ As aid budgets shrink, impact investing offers a way to direct private capital toward social and environmental challenges. Join us tomorrow, Sept. 2, for a Devex Pro Briefing that explores the fundamentals of impact investing, including the key players, emerging trends, and where impact capital fits. This briefing provides a practical guide on when and how NGOs and social enterprises can access this capital and become investment-ready.

Quelling the implosion

Oxfam GB’s leadership clash that started last year got downright nasty. Former CEO Halima Begum accused the charity of “brutally” dismissing and stigmatizing her and the former board chair of making her feel “humiliatingly infantilized.” The charity hit back, saying an independent review found “substantive and very serious concerns” about Begum’s conduct, decision-making, and leadership style.

Over the years, the foundation has increasingly relied on one major donor, the Hans Wilsdorf Foundation. But the funder tells Devex its support runs through 2026.
The WHO Foundation, which was created to raise additional funding for the World Health Organization, could be at risk of running out of money itself.
The foundation has ramped up its fundraising over the past two years and is expected to transfer over $100 million to the U.N. agency from 2026-2030 with over $42 million slated for 2026. But donor funding for its own operations, has not seen similar growth.
The WHO Foundation is not funded by WHO, and instead fundraises for its own operations. It also collects a percentage of the grants it receives for programs.

The search for new money is reshaping impact investing
With governments pulling back from development finance, impact investors are eyeing new markets and models — but the capital gap remains far beyond what private money can cover.
When aid plummeted last year, the development landscape started looking everywhere for funds: Europe, Asia, the Gulf, philanthropies, and impact investing. But no individual donor or industry looked able to fill the gap left by the drastic cuts.
“When USAID was disintegrated there was a lot of conversation among impact investors and particularly foundations, those that work in development finance,” Fran Seegull, president of U.S. Impact Investing Alliance, told Devex. “The sheer magnitude of the withdrawal, there would be no way, unless they were highly coordinated vehicles at scale, to really plug the gap.”
That’s still the case. As of the end of 2024, a Global Impact Investing Network survey of 368 investors showed that $448.2 billion out of a total of $13.1 trillion across all investment strategies was allocated to impact investing — just 3%.

This week, we’re sharing data from Devex’s job board, showing an overall hiring slowdown across the sector. Where opportunities do exist, they are often short-term assignments and mid-career roles.

Despite this, agriculture remains a hiring spot — and this week, we examine exactly where those openings are and highlight the latest new roles from the Aga Khan Foundation, the Global Green Growth Institute, and the World Food Programme.

For more insights and tips to help you navigate a highly competitive job market, tune into Devex Career Week, which kicks off Monday, Sept. 7. We’ll be bringing you exclusive reporting and events throughout the week — starting with a briefing with experts from ForAfrika and Catholic Relief Services on Tuesday. We’ll discuss the shifting development job landscape in Africa, where opportunities are emerging, and which roles and skills are in demand. Register now for this event.

Germany’s finalized 2027 draft budget confirms a 6% development cut — slashing crisis reconstruction by 38% even as total federal spending grows via defense-exempt borrowing.

From private money to digital divides, world leaders in Aspen grapple with the future of the sector.

Few places in the world where leaders gather to discuss global problems can rival Aspen, Colorado, in the summer. Nestled in picturesque mountains and surrounded by some of the most expensive homes on the planet, this is a village where the bagel shop sells caviar, and, on the drive in, a moose ambled down the roadside. Something for everyone.

Each summer you’ll find here some of the most powerful people in the world — their hair down, adorned in mountain chic — gathered to consider, and even shape, the future.

Much of the hobnobbing happens at Aspen Institute events throughout the summer, including the high-powered Aspen Security Forum that took place last month. It was on the sidelines of that national security convening that a group of around 40 honchos — leaders of major philanthropies, aid agency chiefs, former members of the U.S. Congress, prominent social entrepreneurs, and influential thinkers — got together to debate the future of global development. Organized by the Aspen Global Innovators Group, the closed-door retreat was convened by Peggy Clark and Jim Pickup and steered by co-chairs Henrietta Fore and John Nkengasong.